Wouldn’t flying be so much easier if we could devise a system of control that would allow us to fly a desired trajectory without all the instrument interpolation and endless control adjustments? In an ideal world, we could simply pull back on the yoke or stick to reach a desired climb attitude, let go of the stick once we reached that attitude, and gain altitude without losing a knot of airspeed or having to touch the pitch-trim wheel. At some point you probably thought to yourself that there had to be a better way. Once you graduated to instrument training under the hood, you quickly realized that precision control required a delicate sequence of adjustments of multiple controls and a complex scan of the instruments just to keep you from losing control. If you started out in a typical light trainer, some of the difficulties you encountered early on were probably related to the fact that you were learning to control the airplane based on its pitch attitude and power setting. Think back to when you were a fresh student pilot trying to understand the relationships between pitch, power, bank angle and a dozen other small but vitally important things related to making the airplane go where you wanted it to. Still, as fly-by-wire control philosophies increasingly spill over into general aviation, we’ll have no choice but to learn about - and ultimately embrace - this new way of flying. ![]() The very notion that the computers can ignore the pilot’s inputs if they so choose but the pilot can never override the computers can be a hard concept to grasp. ![]() The idea that the flight-control computers in a modern fly-by-wire airplane are in charge all of the time still sparks debate among pilots more than 25 years after the technology became the de facto standard in Airbus airliners.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |